Posted by: Chirag Jain on: November 20, 2008
WSJ asks and answers some important questions :
Will fewer companies look to insource into America if the federal government is willing to bail out their domestic competitors?
The answer :
The answer is an obvious yes. Ironically, proponents of a bailout say saving Detroit is necessary to protect the U.S. manufacturing base. But too many such bailouts could erode the number of manufacturers willing to invest here….
Will a U.S.-government bailout go ignored by policy makers abroad?
The answer :
No. A bailout will likely entrench and expand protectionist practices across the globe, and thus erode the foreign sales and competitiveness of U.S. multinationals. And that would reduce these companies’ U.S. employment, R&D and related activities. That would be bad for America…..
Will a federal bailout that politicizes American markets bolster foreign-investor demand for U.S. assets?
The answer :
Not likely. Instead, America runs the risk of creating the kind of “political-risk premium” that investors have long placed on other countries — and that would reduce demand for U.S. assets and thereby the value of the U.S. dollar.
Reduced foreign demand for U.S. assets would be troubling at any time. Its prospect is especially troubling now, when the federal government’s fiscal 2009 deficit is widely forecast to reach something near or exceeding $1 trillion — up from $456 billion last year. With net saving still near zero for U.S. households and falling profits for U.S. companies, financing that deficit will require attracting foreign capital.
Posted by: Chirag Jain on: October 27, 2008
Chandrayaan has just been launched. News articles, stories and much more have spoken that India is sending a satellite to moon, on a shoe-string budget. The budget may be less in comparison to global projects, but $80 million on a project that does nothing to alleviate poverty, reduce deaths, and improve living conditions of destitutes in our streets in India???
But then I’m reminded that if India has to become advanced and developed, it must achieve technological superiority in addition to other financial strenghts, so such a spacecraft mission will bring in immense research, and insight into outer life. We’ll be free to analyse our own data, and should expect to benefit from this space launch.
But with inequality on the rise, poverty is becoming wide-spread, and who
should not know more about it than India, which houses the most number of poor people in the world(among countries).
The graph on your left shows the income distribution among the population of the earth.
I’m still confused. What do you say?
Can we afford to spend $80 million (Rs. 3.86 billion) on improving technology, when the majority of us suffer from immense hardships?
Comments, votes, suggestions….keep them going!!
————–
Like such articles? Sign-up for the email updates which means you’ll be the first to know of any new articles/posts on this blog.
Posted by: Chirag Jain on: October 24, 2008
The WSJ reviews another bubble bursting, just after the subprime one last year :
Credit markets have started to thaw, yet stocks and the larger economy keep sliding. What’s going on? Among the problems are the reality of recession and the uncertainty over Barack Obama’s policies. But the larger story is that the global economy is fast popping its latest monetary bubble, the one over the last 14 months in commodity prices and non-dollar currencies.
Its origin. Not decades ago, but this started in 2007, with Ben Bernanke in the top job as Chairman of Federal Reserve :
This is Ben Bernanke’s creation. The Fed chose to confront the credit crunch as if it were mainly a problem of too little liquidity, not fear of insolvency. To that end it flooded the economy with money, while taking short-term interest rates down to 2% from 5.25% in seven months. The panic only got worse, and this September’s stampede finally led the Treasury and Fed to address the solvency problem by supplying public capital and numerous guarantees to the financial system.
Understanding the chart on the right :
The Fed created a commodity bubble of record proportions, with oil doing a round trip in a single year from $70 up to $147 and back down to $69 yesterday. The dollar also plunged along the way against most global currencies, notably the euro, as the bottom chart illustrates.
The worst part definitely is that oil remained high throughout the year, compelling auto-makers to make huge investments in clean/alternative technology, only to realize oil slump back to $69, and SUVs again in demand.
————–
Like such articles? Sign-up for the email updates which means you’ll be the first to know of any new articles/posts on this blog.
Posted by: Chirag Jain on: October 18, 2008
When all stockowners, mutual fund managers, and hedge funds are turning to cash instead of equities, Warren Buffett takes the contrarian view and says that such a time is fit for buying oversold stocks . His view :
Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.
The unemployment rate may be rising, and banks faltering by the dozen, recession hitting us from all angles, but Warren Buffett seems to put it straight:
So … I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities.
The Oracle of Omaha also makes a few points clear :
I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month — or a year — from now. What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over…
Towards the end, Warren Buffett paints a good picture for the future:
Over the long term, the stock market news will be good. In the 20th century, the United States endured two world wars and other traumatic and expensive military conflicts; the Depression; a dozen or so recessions and financial panics; oil shocks; a flu epidemic; and the resignation of a disgraced president. Yet the Dow rose from 66 to 11,497.
Comments, Votes??
————–
Like such articles? Sign-up for the email updates which means you’ll be the first to know of any new articles/posts on this blog.